# of watchers: 3
|
Fans: 0
| D20: 3 |
Wiki-page rating | Stumble! |
Informative: | 0 |
Artistic: | 0 |
Funny-rating: | 0 |
Friendly: | 0 |
2006-09-11 [Zero Avalon]: and new doesnt matter i like all sets except kamigowa
2006-09-11 [Wally :(]: ooooooo nice deck
2006-09-11 [Zero Avalon]: yeh!
2006-09-11 [skullhead]: It’s a powerful deck but slow as can be. I can run circles around you before you put down the first angel, the walls help but not a lot, you’re going to have trouble with creatures and artifacts with protection from white.
2006-09-11 [skullhead]: You need a blinding angel.
2006-09-11 [Zero Avalon]: lol the deck cant fit them sadly
2006-09-11 [Zero Avalon]: plus im still working on how to get more mana into it
2006-09-11 [skullhead]: I think you need to bring them to play some other way. And I think you have the key
If you can put this angel in the second turn, you my friend will have a powerful and fast deck in your hands; trust me I have seen it before.
2006-09-12 [kittykittykitty]: Yay! Akroma is being reprinted in Timespiral ^________^ Along with the Black Lotus I have heard, though that may just be a crazy rumour o_O
2006-09-12 [Zero Avalon]: Sorry no black in my decks
2006-09-12 [hello]: with no real form of mana acceleration, goblins or madness will kill you before you lay the first angel...plus, there is no chance with the defining deck of extended coming up, Tooth and Nail...just too slow to contend.
2006-09-12 [Zero Avalon]: i know lol this is the first draft of the deck also its to old so its sadly vintage i need to remove alot of cards but its a working progress
2006-09-12 [kittykittykitty]: No black? ;_; I adore black decks :0
2006-09-12 [Zero Avalon]: sorry i am an expert at all colours but i refuce to play black only neutral or good colours for me
2006-09-12 [skullhead]: "an expert at all colours" hum?
2006-09-12 [Zero Avalon]: yeh i spend alll my time playing magic and making decks
2006-09-12 [skullhead]: Ok if you say so, lets see how long it takes you to get this deck running. Do you think your angels can take my 1/1 soldiers deck.
2006-09-12 [Zero Avalon]: let me finish the deck first and make it exstended legal its vintage a the moment but when it is down sure.
2006-09-13 [scscsdvavx]: hey cool deck man... and if you werent so much of a black hater it would make this deck awesome
2006-09-13 [Zero Avalon]: yeh i know lol but i refuce to use black the decks i make are to powerful
2006-09-14 [kittykittykitty]: I think a soldier deck could beat this deck if you have the right cards skull ;P Angels are just too slow against them, so there would be no defence. Only blue decks really do the no-creatures thing well. I really don't see a benefit in having only angel creatures in a deck. Some super cheap ones are needed. Maybe if you wanted to stick with the white flying theme, you could have some birds in there. There are some really good low-mana birds :D
I wouldn't put so many Temple of the False God cards in either. No deck needs four of them. I just see you getting mana screwed for the whole game....
So... how can you be an 'expert at all colours' but you don't play black decks? Then you aren't an 'expert' in black decks :P Actually, I don't think anybody could be an expert at all colours. Even the world champions have prefernces and weaknesses don't they?
I'd say I'm something of a specialist in Zombie decks XD I love them ^^"
Number of comments: 43 | Show these comments on your site |